2nd of Five Requests: ICO rules dates of Jas Athwal inspections must be published, but not addresses of the rental properties in question

 

The QR code has the ICO decision, the front page is below. Redbridge lose on keeping dates of inspections, but win on at keeping addresses secret. I will appeal in due course. 





 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ICO Decision published: Redbridge Labour must disclose correspondence immediately or face referral to police on 18th April

Image
The ICO have published decision notices for five requests. This is the first, the good news is that Redbridge have been ordered to disclose correspondence as to whether Jas Athwal should have been fined for his unlicenced slum flats. The decision is at the bar code. The Council can appeal, a process that can take years. If Redbridge won't supply the information requested, I will be canvassing for a referral to the police at midday on 18th April. It is unacceptable that the suspicion of criminal activity could fester for years.   First page below;  
Read more

Inspection dates and other documents released by Redbridge regarding concerns over misconduct in public office: More information requests made

Image
The documents released by Redbridge on 30th April are not sufficient evidence of misconduct in public office, so I have put in further requests. The inspection dates below show multiple visits to Jas Athwal's properties implying serious defects and beg the question as to why he was not fined. It appears Jas Athwal did not hold licences for most, if  not all of his properties for months, and it seems he only licensed them because of the Joe Pike story. There also is a concern that Jas Athwal's licensing correspondence show new applications being made rather than renewals in most cases.  Redbridge had no correspondence with Jas Athwal's agent, raising the question of whether he invented an agent to avoid blame due to him and his family managing the flats. I have written to Redbridge asking that they commence a belated code of conduct enquiry into Jas Athwal because they have accepted the ICO orders which say Jas Athwal requires more scrutiny than a private landlord. Redbridge...
Read more

Update to police to be delivered to Ilford Police Station on Sunday 28th June at 1pm

  1- My first statement and bundle of documents about my allegations was received by Sir Mark's Rowley office on 21 st April jasathwalmustbeinvestigated.blogspot.com/2026/06/requesting-sir-mark-rowleys-office-for.html 2 – Redbridge Council sent me documents as a consequence of Information Commissioner Office (ICO) disclosure orders in the decision notice previously received by Sir Mark's Office 3 – Before the ICO disclosure orders were published Redbridge argued that Mr Athwal was a private individual and no disclosure was merited. Redbridge decided not to appeal against the disclosure orders. However, when I argued to senior Redbridge staff that a belated standard of conduct investigation into Jas Athwal was required, the Council declined to do so. 4 –I say this refusal to carry out a belated standards investigation into Mr Athwal rises to a concern of a criminal conspiracy to prevent Mr Athwal being fined for his unlicensed sub-standard rental flats. 5 – I ...
Read more